Rolling Meadows
Review (IL)
12 Oaks
renters file lawsuit
TODD SHIELDS
Staff Writer
Published: December 20,
2007
A lawsuit filed in Cook County aimed at a
high-profile housing development
project in Rolling Meadows
contends more than 100 tenants
should receive $70,000 in rental
security deposits they never
received.
The six-count lawsuit
includes three class action
allegations against Michael
Sparks, owner of 12 Oaks of
Woodfield since 2004. The
sprawling 19-building, 692-unit
apartment complex sits at the
southwest corner of Algonquin
Road and Route 53 on the 4700
block of Arbor Drive.
Since 2005, city officials have
attempted to recruit development
firms in rebuilding the 44-acre
site into a multimillion dollar
mixed-use condo project that
would produce an estimated $60
million in tax revenues to
Rolling Meadows during the first
20 years.
Because of the project's size
and proximity to the proposed
STAR Line Metra station in
Schaumburg, as well as the
Schaumburg Convention Center, 12
Oaks has often been a major
topic of city officials.
Sparks said the lawsuit would
not impact the eventual sale or
development of his property,
adding a manager was to blame
for not paying interest to
renters on their security
deposits.
Mistake finally caught
"Interest on security deposits
was less than $1 per renter, but
it was six months before we
caught the mistake and started
paying it," he said.
According to the lawsuit,
Sparks violated the Illinois
Security Deposit Interest Act by
his "willful failure or refusal
to pay the interest due to
Plaintiff's within 30 days of
the end of Plaintiff's 12-month
rental period."
The lawsuit names three former
renters, stating they never
received their security payments
or interest.
May 2006 letter
The lawsuit also states two of
the renters did not receive
promised incentives.
Both men said they received
letters on May 26, 2006, signed
by Sparks explaining if they
extended their leases, they
would receive money based on how
long they agreed to stay extra
and $1,000 in moving expenses.
A potential buyer and developer,
Dallas-based Centex Homes,
terminated its dealings with
Sparks and the city in August
2006, citing an unsteady housing
market.
Yet Sparks' May 2006 letter
cited in the lawsuit said the
agreement to develop would
happen.
"We are selling this property
next year! The purchaser wants
to tear these buildings down and
rebuild condominiums and a
shopping center. What does this
mean to you! If you stay until
you receive a 90-day notice next
year, you will receive a cash
bonus!" Sparks wrote.
"In addition you will be able
to take your range,
refrigerator, dishwasher and air
conditioner at no cost to you. I
believe we have put together a
win-win program where everyone
benefits."
Asked why he offered renters
incentives to extend leases,
Sparks said, "They were asked to
stay on until the wrecking ball
swung. Many times in real estate
sales, things change off and
on," he said.
On Nov. 27, the Rolling
Meadows City Council approved a
resolution to begin negotiations
with Pine Tree Commercial Realty
based in Northbrook for
redevelopment of the site. The
negotiations included creating a
possible tax increment finance
district to reimburse Pine Tree
with public funds, scheduling
planning and zoning hearings and
reviewing a redevelopment
agreement for a conceptual site
plan.
Both Peter Borzak, a partner in
Pine Tree, and Tom Melena,
Rolling Meadows city manager,
did not return requests for
interviews on Monday.
Attorney's thought
Mark Silverman, an attorney in
Rockford, who represents
renters, said Sparks mislead
people in his letter.
"Some people stated they
relied on this letter and so
continued on with 12 Oaks by
paying rent," Silverman said.
Sparks described the class
action lawsuit as "nebulous."
"That's what lawyers do --
sit around and dream up nebulous
lawsuits such as this," he
added.
Copyright 2007, Rolling Meadows
Review, Pioneer Press. All
rights reserved. REPRODUCTION
PROHIBITED